Even the world forsaked you, One shall never abandon himself!
笔者是深圳中学学生代表大会的一名普通学生代表，从去年9月、深圳中学学代会这一全新的校园民主组织建立开始，持续关注学代会工作；然而，学代会之低效、刻板、以及其工作与其目标的不一致性，不得不说令人大开眼界。因此决定写点久违的文字——因为笔者自认这是一个正面影响深中学代会的未来工作的机会。或许能影响到的人有限，然而正如我将在文中讨论的，校园公共事务讨论与民主实践（以下简称校园民主），尽力而为则足矣。
文中观点个人性较强，因此笔者尽力尝试基于较为严密的逻辑予以探讨，且观点均为开放性，也欢迎各位的批评指正。希望这篇文章能对深圳中学目前日渐衰微的校园民主，做一点微小的贡献。另外，本文中全部“校园民主”均代指“校园公共事务讨论与民主实践”，请勿代入这一词汇可能的其它含义，以免影响理解，感谢。
又是星期天晚上，23点的某一时刻；又是同一个人坐在同一张桌子前面敲打着同一把键盘看着同一块屏幕；又是耳机里播放完了残氷，开始播放この惑星で、ただ一つだけ——
这颗星球上的only one
是说我这个人？不，当然不是。群星般灿烂的历史中，不知有多少先贤，面对着草纸、羊皮纸、竹简、宣纸、石碑甚至是大地陷入如此的思考——当然，我并无资格与他们并列，只是庆幸于自己与他们望向的是同一片夜空。
是说这个场景？不，当然不是。场景里的东西或许不同，但是它们如忒休斯之船的每个零件一样，轮回中蕴含着相同的意义与目的——这是一个早在三年前就已经开始的轮回。
我本以为，十几天前的那次会让我最终摆脱这轮回——那确实是一名OIer可以呐喊出的最强音了，如今来看我亦不曾为其中的任何一言而后悔。
却不曾想到，是我自己再一次掀开了魔盒的盖子，放出了痛苦、煎熬、悲伤、恶意、以及希望。
刚刚洗完澡后，在镜子上写下“CSP加油”
回过神来，才发现下面的签名仍然是Dedicatus545
很像电影里的场景——我的过去隔着雾蒙蒙的镜子和我对视，一双眼睛里充满了对未来的希望，而另一双却不敢直视他自己的过去
呵，原来我也有说出AFO的这一天啊，根本没想到这个现实，会来的这么快
Most of my problems still focus on Logic, although I’m having a not bad logic. I usually jump over logic links in my mind during writing and speaking, so many of my creations seems not linked with each other.
Issues on Reading and Listening are not that significant, writing and speaking conducts the most problems.
Mind the vocabulary use and tense use! These are minor mistakes but piling them up leads to a lower score.
Most of the time vocabularies are not really demanding, but you must use them in the correct way. That is, you shall avoid paraphrases that you are not familiar with or are not sure if it is correct. Stability is of the first concern here, since what you need to do is to just illustrate the information, and that’s it!
USE SIMPLE LOGIC. There is no need to explain the very base of everything.
Score: 28/30 with correction rate 39/42
For the vocabulary part, sometimes I still meet words that I am not familiar with. If this happens, it is of the most importance to examine the word in the original text.
When reading history topic passages, never let go of any sentence, since some questions might be asking for them.
Score: 29/30 with correction rate 40/42
Why, most my mistakes are on vocabulary tasks……
Seems that most of other types are not a problem for me anymore, except the last ques in every passage. Sometimes I need to double check if a choice is A MINOR ONE or A MAJOR ONE.
Vocabulary mistakes are still making me frustrated. How on earth am I able to distinguish ‘permanently’ and ‘extensively’ when both are to replace ‘drastically’? Why, the answer told me it is extensively! The only thing I can do is try to put them back into the text and try reading them again and again. Hope this works.
Score: 30/30, correction 41/42
Not a single problem exists. I guess my concept of ‘check every word of its presence in the passage’ works well.
This reading is relatively easy. Although one history and another anthropology passage is included, these two ones only consist of elementary reasonings, so the entire difficulty is significantly cut, since most times history topics plays the role of the boss.
Score:30/30, correction 33/33
Nothing to say. This TPO is extremely easy……
Harder than expected, got only 25/30 with 37/42 correction rate.
Main mistakes are the last question of each passage.
I find it important that in TOFEL test, a correct choice will always be correct, and every word of it will be correct as well.
Therefore it’s quite essential to check every statement in a choice thoroughly in the passage. Even if it seems obvious, it may not be a major idea or has some minor misunderstanding from the original text.
Material: TPO 49
Reading: 28/30
Listening: 25/30
I made more mistakes than I expected.
For 3-6 multiple choice problems, it is important to focus on the BEGINNING SENTENCE that was given in the problem.
If a choice is absolutely correct but has nothing to do with it, then is can’t be chosen
TPO 54, Reading + Listening
Reading 29/30 (40/41)
Listening 25/30 (30/34)
Nothing really important, just need to do some more vocabulary.
When placing sentences, MIND their association with the sentence that is going to be behind it: most time there will be some relationship.
The Answer looks like a product of different items under a sqrt, therefore a basic tecnique is to use ln.
After this, calculation of product is changed to calculation of sum, which looks like:
Now the problem is to seek the maximum average value of gem sequences that match the model string.
When a problem of strings contains ONE model and MANY patterns, AC Automaton should come to one’s mind at once!